Deweesereport

#61 October 2011

Constitutional Convention Can Not Be Controlled

Friday, October 14th, 2011

As Americans become more frightened by the disastrous direction our government is taking, and more frustrated that elected representatives are not listening to them, the demand is growing for drastic action. In recent months the action most heard in state houses across the nation is a rising call for a new Constitutional Convention (Con Con).

Supporters somehow think a Con Con is the solution to saving our Republic. They want to amend the Constitution to force a balance budget. They want to shore up ambiguous language to make the meaning clear. They want to assure there is no doubt what America is and should be. For most pushing such an agenda, their intentions are honest.

Their solution will be a disaster for one simple reason – no one can control a Constitutional Convent. It doesn‟t matter how well intentioned its purpose. It doesn‟t matter how well planned. It doesn‟t matter what the actual resolution says and the people think they are approving. A Con Con has no oversight or rules other than those made by the actual participating delegates themselves. There are no rules for selecting delegates.

Once a ConCon is called for by the legal number of states, as laid out in Article V of the Constitution, It is the duty of Congress to call for one. Period. That‟s as far as it goes. In this day, when Nancy Pelosi, as Speaker of the House was able to twist enough arms to force through the Health care plan against the wishes of a strong majority of Americas; when the current Congress was able to flimflam the American people into believing it had really cut the budget; when these same people are the ones who will set the rules for a Con Con, from establishing the delegate- selection process, to dictating who will be qualified to be delegates, how on earth can anyone support such a disaster in the making. A Con Con will result in one thing- our precious Constitution laid out on an operating table to be dissected and bludgeoned by Dr. Jekyll. (more…)

“Progressives” and the Art of Civility

Friday, October 14th, 2011

“Let‟s take these S.O.B.s out!”

When concerned Americans objected to Obama’s health care scheme and turned out at town hall meetings in strong opposition, they were called racists and fringe radicals. The Department of Homeland Security then released a report calling those Americans who opposed Obama’s policies “potential domestic terrorist.” As more and more Americans took up the protests against an ever growing federal government, the “Progressives” took to the CNN/MSNBC/New York Times media cabal to accuse the growing Tea Party of violence and then called for “civility” in political debate. That of course meant NO DEBATE. Its got to be their way or … as Teamster leader James Hoffa put it… ”Let’s take these sons of bitches out.”

Nice, very civil. If we said it we would be accused of promoting violence. But these are the compassionate progressives, not the racist, violent Tea Party. Following are more of their compassionate, civil quotes and actions, just for the record.

“It’s a fight literally for our right to exist. Don’t misunderstand what this is. Don’t misunderstand – not a joke, not a joke, not an applause line. You are the only folks keeping the barbarians from the gates… You are the only non-governmental power…The only one who has the power and capacity to stop this onslaught…You know, to state simply what I stated two years ago…the other side has declared war on labors house and it’s about time we stand up!” Vice President of the United States Joe Biden, speaking to the same Teamster labor Day rally with James Hoffa. Hoffa also publicly told Biden that the teamster army is ready to march for Obama. (more…)

We Haven’t Survived 9/11 in Good Shape

Friday, October 14th, 2011

When I was preparing the September 2001 issue of my newsletter, Privacy Journal, we received the following message at 9:27 a.m. Sept. 11 from Marie George of the CNIL data protection agency in France: “In the name of President Gentot, all the members of the commission and its staff, let me express our compassion and our support after the terrible event that has stricken America today. Be sure we stand by you.”

We published the note and this response: “We will all need this support and compassion. We professionals have to be sure that the strictures that will inevitably follow a calamity like this are not directed at our own law-abiding citizens, but aimed precisely at the sources of the threats.”

WE HAVE DONE EXACTLY THAT. We have allowed angry surveillance and intrusive questioning to be turned against our own people, spending billions of dollars in bogus technology and identity schemes, most of it to create what policy makers will admit is “security theater.” They will say that that is what the American public wants, not carefully targeted security precautions directed towards the likely perpetrators of the September 11 terrorist attacks and their progeny. (more…)

Our Least Sustainable Energy Option

Friday, October 14th, 2011

From a land use, economic, environmental or raw materials perspective, wind is unsustainable.

by Paul Driessen

President Obama and a chorus of environmentalists, politicians, corporate executives and bureaucrats are perennially bullish on wind power as the bellwether of our “clean energy economy of the future.”

In reality, wind energy may well be the least sustainable and least eco-friendly of all electricity options. Its shortcomings are legion, but the biggest ones can be grouped into eight categories.

Land. As American humorist and philosopher Will Rogers observed, “They ain’t making any more of it.” Wind turbine installations impact vast amounts of land, far more than traditional power plants. (more…)